Research ArticleArticles

LLLT Part 3: Critically Assessing Recent Published LLLT Device Trials: Limitations, Recommendations, and Conclusions

Sharon A. Keene
Hair Transplant Forum International May 2015, 25 (3) 102-105; DOI: https://doi.org/10.33589/25.3.0102

Article Figures & Data

Tables

  • Table 1.
  • Table 2.

    Hair Count Comparisons: Laser Comb, Korean Helmet, U.S. “Top Hat” Helmet

    Device N=LLLT/Sham% Pts >20 hair/cm2 LLLT% Pts >20 hair/cm2 Sham% Pts > 15% incr LLLT% Pts >15% incr Sham
    L Comb-M 7,9/12 beam 67/3638-68%0-14%N/A No raw dataN/A
    L Comb-F 9,12 beam 82/4040-41%5.5%N/AN/A
    Helmet 1 M/F 15/1426.6%7.1%33% Ave 29%14.3% Ave 25%
    Helmet 2-M 22/1972.7%21.0%100% Ave 67.2%37% Ave 75.7%
    Helmet 2-F 24/2879.1%3.6%95.8% (Ave 50% increase)30% (Ave 24% increase)
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
LLLT Part 3: Critically Assessing Recent Published LLLT Device Trials: Limitations, Recommendations, and Conclusions
Sharon A. Keene
Hair Transplant Forum International May 2015, 25 (3) 102-105; DOI: 10.33589/25.3.0102
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section