Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1. Long hair transplant. A: Marking of anterior hairline; B: appearance immediately after surgery.
- Figure 2. A: Marking of donor area for surgery according to the classic technique; B: marking of donor area with hair maintained in its natural length for surgery according to the PLH technique.
- Figure 3. A: Microscopic view of follicular units of shaved hair (10× enlarged); B: microscopic view of follicular units of long hair (10× enlarged).
- Figure 4. Surgery times for both groups (donor area harvesting, FU implant, and total surgery time), minutes (mean±standard deviation).
- Figure 5. A comparison between speeds of implant (FU/min) for both groups (mean±standard deviation).
- Figure 6. Male patient, aged 41, class IV baldness, submitted to an implant of 1,289 FU using the long hair transplant technique. A: Preoperative; B: first postoperative day; C: 6 months post-operative.
- Figure 7. Male patient, aged 68, class VI baldness, submitted to an implant of 1,856 FUs using the long hair transplant technique. A: Preoperative; B: first postoperative day; and C: 6 months postoperative.
Tables
Time to Return to Social Activities Preview Long Hair < 7 days 7-14 days > 14 days 4 6 0 Classic Technique 2 5 3 - Table 2. Subjective assessment made by patients from both groups regarding the result obtained after 6 months.
Excellent Good Average Poor Preview Long Hair 7 3 0 0 Classic Technique 7 3 0 0
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.